What I meant was 'you should be able to post...' as in you ARE, as far as I understand. It is in fact what an admin told me when I asked. The softness and beauty of a picture can't and shouldn't be a part of the judging material when you decide if it is explict/porn/offensive material though. I mean, it IS just up to opinion and preference -and not to mention the skill of the artist. Problem is as always the definition.

Then, of course as always, you can still get reported and have to defend yourself. There are always borderline cases and different opinions on things. And zealous people. The phase it takes for new rules and shit to grow into a community is always damn turbulent ones. It seems as if DA mroe or less never allowed explict sexual material (porn) but never before bothered to hunt it down... until few months ago when they realised the danger of possible lawsuits, heh.

Why hank you. :D