soltian: (kindly stfu)
soltian ([personal profile] soltian) wrote2004-05-30 07:02 am

Rant About a Couple Random Things

The nudity policy on DA is complete shit. I don't think I can tolerate it for very long. I want to DO something about it. Everyone, let me know if you're interested in perhaps forming a group protest. The censorship is killing me.

Other than that, 217 was the best chapter in a while. I'm extremely saddened by the nature of Kimimaro's death. It was affrontingly tragic, every detail of it made me ache with pity. The poor, poor boy. The GaaraLee was effin adorable though. Gaara: LETS GO FLY ON CLOUDS OF SAND TOGETHER!! Lee: *GIGGLE* OKAY!!

I need sleep.
ext_51838: (Default)

[identity profile] croaky.livejournal.com 2004-05-30 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
What I meant was 'you should be able to post...' as in you ARE, as far as I understand. It is in fact what an admin told me when I asked. The softness and beauty of a picture can't and shouldn't be a part of the judging material when you decide if it is explict/porn/offensive material though. I mean, it IS just up to opinion and preference -and not to mention the skill of the artist. Problem is as always the definition.

Then, of course as always, you can still get reported and have to defend yourself. There are always borderline cases and different opinions on things. And zealous people. The phase it takes for new rules and shit to grow into a community is always damn turbulent ones. It seems as if DA mroe or less never allowed explict sexual material (porn) but never before bothered to hunt it down... until few months ago when they realised the danger of possible lawsuits, heh.

Why hank you. :D

[identity profile] onnaevilsmith.livejournal.com 2004-05-30 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Very welcome! ^_^

and ya. I think a lot of people were complaining. But the problem is DA is divided. you have the older mature artists who find the human body that of beauty and I have seen some very beautiful artwork of positions and stuff.. but it was more to look at the meaning of the picture rather than what the people were actuall doing.

then you have the DA members who are under 15 who think the world is all happy and pretty ponies ^^; and I think the new rules and stuff involve to them. I think Da is scared of a kid actually hiunting down and looking at a pr0n pic and their mother walks in, sees what is on the screen, and sues DA.


Bah I dunno if I jus sterotyped but that's how I feel ^^;

It's sad that people these days solve complications by jus.. Sueing them.
ext_51838: (Default)

[identity profile] croaky.livejournal.com 2004-05-30 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
"then you have the DA members who are under 15 who think the world is all happy and pretty ponies ^^; and I think the new rules and stuff involve to them."

At first I was shock and scared of that possibility, too. But no. I don't beleive that. The new rules are, with few exceptions I think, all based on legal and control matters (the matters of mods and admins interpreting the rules as more harsh than not because they want to, is a compleatly different thing to be upset about. Stupid people. Everywhere. ><;;). Then there is the gratious(sp?) nudity rule that is just DA's own thing. It IS illegal to post under-aged sex pictures online in many places. It is or can be illagal to post material qualifying as pornogaphy on open communities sites even if under a 'mature' cut. It is defenitely illegal to post pictures of naked models without their consent, etc. So in reality DA is doing nothing really wrong (bothersome as it might still feel for us artists, feh). It is just a matter of delicate opinion... as always... which leads to heacdaches... as always.

OK. No really. SO SORRY for spamming your journal Soltian. I am shutting up now. @_@

[identity profile] onnaevilsmith.livejournal.com 2004-05-30 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
XD XD My Aim name is JaidaRocket. If you wanna keep talking about it we can move to there before poor Soltian gets too spammed